Explaining: "Common Intention and in furtherance of" ( Sec 34 of IPC)

Common Intention

Sec 34 of IPC provides that when an act done by several persons in furtherance of common intention of all, each of such persons is liable for that act in the same manner as if it done by him alone.
Sec 34 of the IPC is invoked in cases where it may be difficult to distinguish between the act of individual members of a party or to prove as to what part was played by each of them.
 In Mahboob Shah vs. Emperor, AIR 1945(PC)118 ,the Privy Council stated that to invoke sec 34 successfully , it must be shown that the criminal act complained against was done by one of accused persons in the furtherance of the common intention of all and that if this is shown, then liability for the crime may be imposed on any one of the persons in the same manner as if the act were done by him alone.

The term “in furtherance of” used in sec 34has been elucidated in Shankarlal Kachrabhai vs State Of Gujrat, AIR 1965 SC 1260, WHERE THE Supreme Court observed:
            “The dictionary meaning of the word “furtherance” is “advancement or promotion”. If four persons have a common intention to kill A, they will have to do many acts in promotion or prosecution of that design in order to fulfil it. “
         Some illustration will clarify the point.: The facts proved before a court are that A and C suddenly emerge out of the darkness and gives axe blows to B, who dies as a result of those injuries. It is further in evidence that A gave a blow to the arm of B, while C gave blow to the abdomen of B. By virtue of Sec 34, the Court can hold both A and B liable for the murder of B.


Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Modernization of Fundamental Duties and Indian Constitution.

Indian Election commission and its Mechanism

Right to vote in India is a Special Right not Fundamental right